Sunday, 24 August 2014

Whispering Microbes and Talking Inspectors

Companies and professionals working in the QC, QA departments of the pharma industry are increasingly facing the need to constantly update themselves and their teams on the various regulatory requirements, technologies and techniques. This need arises from the desire to maintain leadership, the requirement to comply with regulations and the most importantly to meet the quality expectations.

The workshop ”Whispering Microbes and Talking Inspectors " was held in Hyderabad on 5th and 6th of June 2014. It was organized by Vienni training and consulting LLP. The workshop aimed at introducing and educating pharma professionals on how to better manage and control microbiological issues. The main theme of the workshop was a review of the misconceptions, chief expectations and monitoring requirements of an environment monitoring program and data integrity, considering not only the impact brought by the advances in the technical dimension, but also other dimensions such as policy, quality, regulatory and technical aspects.

The workshop was opened to only 27 selected participants, representing 9 companies from across the country via systematic selection process.

The workshop was inaugurated by a thought-provoking discussions on the most common misconceptions that professionals have while they design an EMP. The workshop took off in the right earnest, with a presentation on the handling of microbiological data deviations. A very engaging case study served as a bridge between the two presentations and kept the participants keenly focused on the subject at hand.

A subsequent presentation on “Assessing Integrity of Microbiological Data: In-spector’s expectations and how to reach compliance” provided serious inputs to enable better assessment. Discussions after the talk showed the increased understanding that the participants gained. Most feedback suggested that the participants were now better equipped to evaluate data and certainly were better at understanding inspectors expectations.

The workshop continued on Day 2 with a discussion on “Performing self inspections of microbiology laboratory: Tricks and Traps”. Scaling up operations is always needs a great deal of experience and the very next topic was “Laboratory Sterilization - Cycle design and qualification: Operational differences between laboratory and production sterilization “. And the day two ended with a talk on Designing of Microbiological tests for complex formulations.

 At the conclusion of the workshop there was a general agreement that the event was a perfect fit for the professionals’ training needs. Given the increased use of technologies, need for regulatory compliance and the rush to the market, there was a request from all participants to continue to organize more such workshops. Finally, it was proposed to establish an open forum under the Vienni umbrella, to continue the discussion and the exchange of ideas. In that spirit, a linked-in group has been started for the participants.


Saturday, 19 July 2014

Dry Heat Sterilization Cycle Design & Development at lower temperature


There are standards and references available for people wanting to establish dry heat sterilization cycles at lower temperature. While these standards help in learning, it is indeed a challenge when you are asked to establish dry-heat sterilization process for steroidal API.
This is the story of a project of VIENNI™. The project started like others with initial trials conducted by the client’s in-house validation team. The results were not satisfactory. The challenge persisted while a few facts were overlooked. The product, process and procedures needed an expert’s touch!
The basic challenges:

1.   Product safety and efficacy has to be retained
2.  Development of an effective sterilization cycle recipe
3. Presentation of microbiological results

Vienni was brought-in to support for design and to develop the dry-heat sterilization cycle. The initial gap analysis revealed some interesting facts in the sterilization cycle design process. The most important gaps identified were taken stock of and assessed through discussions. Some of them are as listed below:

      1. Arrangement pattern of containers used to keep load item (The API)
            2.  Use of non-uniform perforated containers
      3.   Location of the containers
      4.  Packing of the load item (the API)
      5.  Cycle parameter establishment
      6.   Product stability at the stated temperature
      7. Temperature profile

The above gaps were systematically addressed and closed. The new process and parameters determined were implemented.
The very first step in the implementation was to address the arrangement pattern of containers, uniform perforated containers, arrangement and location of the containers, optimized packing of the load item, hence, first four challenges were overcome! The next step was to set the physical parameters of the cycle. These parameters were found to be inconsistent and performing above the limit, during initial trials and were identified to be a recurring problem. The Eureka-moment was when the temperature in the load items was reduced to below the temperature recorded during initial trials and the set parameters were revised accordingly. Finally, after a few science-and data-based trials, the temperature inside the product was recorded within the limits.

The last challenge was to prove acceptance through the microbiological studies i.e. BI-incubation and the sterility test. The results of the microbiological studies results were also found as per the pre-determined specifications. A trial run was conducted to evaluate and establish the come-up time, which was found to be insufficient after which some more trials were required to determine the optimum come up time, sterile hold and cool down time. The runs passed the sterility test and the incubation test in flying colours.
The exposure time and temperature of the cycle was set based on the D-value calculation of the biological indicator.

Experience, expertise, rigor and patience helped us establish, develop and design a dry-heat sterilization cycle in a record time. Yet another feather in our cap!